5Z
April 1st 11, 04:02 AM
On Thursday, March 31, 2011 3:19:07 PM UTC-7, Nyal Williams wrote:
> I don't mind giving a cockpit checkout in gliders I have not flown. My
> statement says simply that the pilot has read the POH and that I have
> conducted a review of the instruments and flight controls, and then sign
> that statement.
I agree. IMHO, the insurance company is using the CFIG as an agent to confirm that the pilot has a basic understanding of the glider, and has at least spoken with a person of authority who holds the "keys" to flight in the new plane.
I go over the POH, cockpit, and general basics of operation. The details are very dependent on whether I know the person or the glider.
I will not endorse the logbook if I have any belief that the pilot is irresponsible enough to not obtain the proper training (whether from a CFIG or other experienced pilot) prior to a first flight. And the endorsement only confirms that I have provided the briefing, no more, no less.
-Tom
> I don't mind giving a cockpit checkout in gliders I have not flown. My
> statement says simply that the pilot has read the POH and that I have
> conducted a review of the instruments and flight controls, and then sign
> that statement.
I agree. IMHO, the insurance company is using the CFIG as an agent to confirm that the pilot has a basic understanding of the glider, and has at least spoken with a person of authority who holds the "keys" to flight in the new plane.
I go over the POH, cockpit, and general basics of operation. The details are very dependent on whether I know the person or the glider.
I will not endorse the logbook if I have any belief that the pilot is irresponsible enough to not obtain the proper training (whether from a CFIG or other experienced pilot) prior to a first flight. And the endorsement only confirms that I have provided the briefing, no more, no less.
-Tom